No internet connection
  1. Home

Comments for https://ctrader.com/products/3308

By system
    2026-02-25 20:16:59.910Z
    • 3 comments
    1. A
      algo_expert
        2026-02-25 20:16:59.968Z

        Dear Developer,
        Thank you for the detailed explanation of your GA validation process.
        During my testing on XAUUSD H1 (Dec 2025 - Feb 2026), I see that the default trade volume (10000 units) caused immediate account wipeout under standard test capital conditions.
        Could you please clarify:

        1. Is position size fixed by default, or does it adapt to account balance?
        2. Is there an internal safeguard to prevent opening oversized positions relative to equity?
        3. What minimum recommended account size corresponds to the default lot size?
        4. Are your published GA results based on a specific fixed account size (and if so, which one)?

        Understanding this would help align test environment assumptions with your GA research framework. Best regards.

        1. Ggalashinalex100
            2026-02-25 21:37:04.965Z2026-02-26 13:24:16.995Z

            Dear algo_expert,

            Thank you for the thoughtful questions — and thanks for testing cBot.

            On XAUUSD, a default volume of 10,000 units is overly aggressive for many “standard” test deposits. I generally recommend risking around 1% of your account balance per trade and I do not recommend going above that.

            You can trade with any volume, I don't want to limit you, but please keep in mind the risks and the potential drawdown that your account equity must be able to withstand. As a practical starting point, you can try 0.1 lot (and later 1 lot) with a $10,000 account and compare the outcomes.

            Also, please don’t treat the default settings as “universal.” There are no truly universal parameters: some traders prefer a more aggressive style, while others prefer a smoother equity curve with more predictable, risk-controlled performance. I intentionally do not hard-limit traders inside the robot.
            To properly understand and control risk, you should focus on risk/quality metrics such as Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, maximum drawdown, expectancy, profit factor, etc. There are many metrics, and which ones matter most depends on your own objectives and risk tolerance.

            Markets also change over time, and so do the parameter combinations that perform well or poorly — that is exactly why I built the genetic optimization workflow in the first place.
            Answers to your questions:

            1. Position sizing: by default, it is not automatically balance-adaptive. I recommend sizing at ~1% risk and selecting volume accordingly.

            2. Internal safeguard: No, there is no internal safeguard that automatically prevents oversized positions relative to equity. I recommend reviewing each parameter individually in my dashboard and also the interactions between parameters. This helps you estimate what performance and risk profile you may get across different time periods.

            3. Recommended starting point for XAUUSD: start with 0.1 lot on a $10,000 account, then test 1 lot. You can also use cTrader’s built-in optimization to see what works best for your environment, and then validate out-of-sample.

            4. GA published assumptions / account size: the screenshot you saw was for NASDAQ 100. For that research run, I used an account balance of $100,000 and a traded volume of $15,000 (not lots — USD notional, to make comparisons across different assets easier). For the GA runs on XAUUSD, I used the same assumptions. For BTXUSDT, I used an account balance of $100,000 and a traded volume of $10,000.

            If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.

            Best wishes,

            Alex

            1. Aalgo_expert
                2026-03-03 18:32:22.901Z

                Thank you for clarifying the sizing logic and GA assumptions. It is clear the system is designed for flexible research-driven optimization rather than preset-based trading.

                You may consider adding an optional balance-adaptive mode or risk warning preset for less experienced users. Otherwise, the logic and transparency are appreciated.